Jokes on you if @Az_F is on board lol
Not really: I genuinely donāt mind trying it, but not alone, because it wonāt mean anything statistically. Not that a population of two means much either mind you.
What would be interesting is if all the known Flex owners who got their implants in the suspicious baggy recently - those who have had problems as well as those who havenāt - did the double-blind test: then youād have interesting data to look at.
Matter of fact Amal, do you know of any non-flexNExT implantee who got a rash too? I was under the impression that the common denominator was the flexNExT, not really the packaging. Maybe a tolerance to size issue.
What comes to my mind now is that my bodmod-artist was a bit surprised that the implant itself was a little sticky to the touch - so the layer of adhesive was there, I guessā¦
Now I know Iām not allergic to implanted soy - yay! 
1 Like
ā¦yet
Itās just waiting
ā¦biding itās time
Yāall not calming me down, you know? 
But I guess Iāll be fine, if it didnāt attack me until now, I hope it wonāt do at all 
I had one of those 2 months ago and I didnāt have a rash.
But I do like that itās heat sealed now.
My installer told me a german product would need a 10mm heat seal with a date and/or an ID.
yeah, mine smiled a bit about different standards, too
But he is used to working with Americans, so heās fine with all that - he said itās not a 100% (plus safety surcharge, the German way) safe job, rather something around the 98% or so, but as long as I was okay with that, he agreed to do the job Visiting him again next weekend, already sooo excited! 
2 Likes
Not that Iām aware of no.
Could it be a combination of both? Larger surface area of potentially contaminated surface triggering a higher likelihood of reaction?
Either way, more of a curiosity than anything else, its a moot point when Amal has stepped up to the plate and is making it right for any still in the wild.
Yeah I think Iād rather not experiment on customers hahaā¦ no need to poke anyone.