Thanks @DeviantOllam for a great overview talk about implants.
Been waiting weeks on this and it’s up as I’m falling asleep Sigh
Is Cyborgification Right for YOU?
Too late to find out… Let’s hope it is.
Joking aside, you all know that I want more than what is possible right now. So implants are a no brainer.
I also had to rest before watching it.
That was a really good talk. I expected no less though
Yeah, the first half I watched last night, agreed, it was really good.
But tbe 2nd half remains a mystery
I have to wait 6 days to find out
That may have been my fault , I commented on it and that may have made Dev lock it down
Oh well, I just get to practice my waiting skills
Hah, it’s not anyone’s fault that it’s not viewable right now… other than the fault of YouTube.
Once you set something as a scheduled release, their system makes it “private” and not viewable even in an non-public manner. But I am really looking forward to hearing everyone’s feedback about it. I sometimes (usually for my full-length lecture videos) release them as a “premiere” which is basically a live stream with a chat window, so I’ll be in the chat responding to folk there in a few days.
See some of you on Monday! (and I’ll also participate in this thread here, too, for sure)
Thanks to the whole community for being awesome!
You actually posted haha
Welcome back…
Yea I have been waiting very impatiently for this video, I liked it
Regarding my safe conversion… I know Lf is broken, but I still feel it’s a bit secure since sniffing the credential from my hand is going to be difficult
But maybe I’m just trying to justify my questionable decisions haha
I intend to upgrade it to HF in the near future, but the HF board I have, is not what I’d like it to be
Oh yeah almost as soon as i showed that clip i felt bad for how effusively i said, “Is this secure? Noooooo.” in my presentation.
I was a bit to over-the-top with that, I agree. I was only attempting to convey that anyone would be able to clone the credential with a flipper, but that doesn’t take into account how close to you they’d have to get.
All good,
I laughed, I Was like “well tell me how you really fell”
This is great! Been watching you for ages @DeviantOllam, I’m very much looking forward to watching this! Thank you!
FYI this talk is premiering right now with a really active chat going on.
This was an awesome talk! Thank you for putting this together and for sharing it!
Just watched the presentation, thanks so much for putting that together. You alluded to being able to securely use RFID. Do you have any links to where I learn more about that? I’ve wanted to do what Eriequiet did to my bedside gun safe but the ease of cloning chips has always given me pause. Assuming I control both sides is it possible to create something that’s resistant to cloning without spending a fortune?
My logic was,
The safe can absolutely be cut open, or in the case of a pistol safe… can be taken outright… so there’s not much point making any more resistant than the effort to just take or cut the safe
Implants have a hard enough time coupling with readers when you intend to, so I’m not really worried about someone covertly reading my implant… also have like 10 in that hand kinda helps in a funny way because there’s a good chance they grab the wrong one or get conflicting errors haha
I do intend to upgrade to a hf board at some point since there is a vulnerability in the LF board I don’t love
I can’t fault your logic and I agree that LF is “good enough” from a security standpoint, especially considering the other ways there are to get into the safe. Still if time and budget will allow I’d like to go with something more secure, as much to learn about what’s out there and how it works as to make accessing my safe more convenient.
I think that the new board that DT sells is not vulnerable. While I should probably get one of the new ones, my xAC v2 board is not yet installed so I’m probably sticking to the old one for the time being.
Correct, I got one of the newer boards when I was sampling the market to find one with the issue, should have mentioned that