Return of the flexUG4!

Soon™ is now!

If you haven’t heard of the flexUG4, it’s a Ultimate Gen4 magic transponder on a newly redesigned flex antenna. The UG4 is capable of emulating quite a few varieties of 14443a transponders including MIFARE Classic (4 and 7-byte UIDs), Type 4 NTAGs, and some other ultralight transponders.

Can Emulate:

  • MIFARE Mini S20 4/7/10 byte UID
  • MIFARE 1k S50 4/7/10 byte UID
  • MIFARE 4k S70 4/7/10 byte UID
  • MIFARE Ultralight EV1
  • NTAG 210/212/213/215/216

Configurable parameters:

  • Preset card types (see above)
  • UID
  • UID Length (4/7/10-byte)
  • SAK (1 byte)
  • ATQA (2 bytes)
  • ATS (Custom length / Disable)

13 Likes

Let’s go! I know a lot of people were waiting for this one so I’m stoked to see it for sale now. :smiley:

6 Likes

I am stoked to see that my love for the UMC that lead to the first UG4, has inspired so many others. Every time I hear about someone getting the UG4 my heart fills up a bit more. At DC and around the various discord servers I frequent I have met so many other people who love this chip as much as I do.

Thanks to DT for originally agreeing to take on the commission for custom work, and for ensuring so many others have gotten use and enjoyment out of the UG4.

8 Likes

Sweet! Do you have a by side comparison of the new antenna? Just curious what changed to finally fix it.

3 Likes

It’s impossible to keep on top of every development out there in the world, so it’s critical that adventurous customers like yourself bring these things to our attention!

Tuning pure and simple. The old flexUG4 antennas were re-used antennas we had in stock for another chip type, but the tuning wasn’t perfect. Still it worked, so we produced flexUG4 using it. The problem was that the antennas all have tolerance issues that change the tuning slightly, and the chips also have their own capacitances, with tolerances issues that change the tuning slightly. Since the antenna was already functioning right on the edge of acceptable, we were getting matchups of chip and antenna variances that would throw the performance into the gutter on about 65% of chip+antenna parts we created.. not acceptable.

So we invested the time and money into developing a specific antenna tuned just for the UMC, and performance is great across every combination of inductance + capacitance variance we’ve encountered so far.

7 Likes

Nope. We’d have to waste a chip to make a shitty version for the comparison. But there is this photo of the new one in testing. I got similar range on the ones we assembled today.

2 Likes

I can send you mine once i remove it :sweat_smile:

Any upgrade possible if we send the old one in or is it just better to get a whole new one?

2 Likes

here’s the comparison;

old antenna = shit
new antenna = nice
13 Likes

ehh.. we’ll take your old one in exchange for a discount coupon on a new one :slight_smile:

6 Likes

Joy to the world! Gonna be a joy to tinker with :0

2 Likes

So! Helping a friend out for her first time implant and she’s thinking of the UG4 over the m1, since it can be used on way more HF systems. But, she’s not very technically inclined. Benefit of the M1 was you could use the mifare app to reprogram gen2a. Would the UG4 allow for reprogramming the UID at all via phone NFC, or some way for me to set her up to do so herself via phone? I can do proxmark myself, just want to help her out.

1 Like

I think the UG4 can be configured as a Gen2 tag:

That should let her use her phone in exactly the same way

But, if Mifare classic is all she really wants it for, then the UG4 is a slightly worse emulator from what I remember… Not as capable of adapting to weirdo systems?

Plus if she wanted to use the UG4 for something other than MFC she’d have to use something like the PM3 to reprogram it to the new type anyways…

2 Likes

Oh that’s excellent. She decided to go with the UG4 in the end just because she wants the expanded capability, though I let her know the risks. Will be helping her with the programing for now.

5 Likes