Balanced a Hammy Field Detector on top of the probe. It appears that my âscanâ readings come out lower with a HFD, but my âpowerscanâ readings are roughly the same with one.. And I get the highest readings with a âscanâ but no HFD. Thatâs partially why Iâm suspecting momentum of the physical components of the meter may be throwing off my readings. What is notable is that normal scan + HFD lines up pretty well with both powerscan readings.
Scan no HFD: ~6v
Powerscan with or without HFD: ~3v
Scan with HFD: ~3v
not final numbers, phone case and sticker involved, more info below
In the event that momentum throwing off the readings, is the blink counteracting that, or is it just landing there out of chance?
For reference, my Pixel8 has taginfo and ZINC, and Iâm doing this all with a case and hammy sticker, in line with the hammy sticker (serves as good point of reference).
Bad news (for me): Looks like I placed my hammy sticker in a less than ideal spot
Great news (for all of us): Looks like the FMP is a hell of a lot more accurate with finding ideal hammy sticker locations than a blinky.
As long as we accept one value or the other, not requiring both, I see no issue with this. I can also throw an experiment in there later today to see how much of a difference this makes.
At this moment Iâd like to get more testing in before I lean one way or the other, particularly caseless. Also, it is worth noting that Iâm seeing lower numbers on contact with a hammy sticker than ~5-10mm away.
At this point I agree, though my opinion is suject to change based on how my shitty door lock (does not work with xSeries, does with offbrand Magic Ring) reads.