It really makes me smile to think how every person with boobies reading this thread is now sitting at home, trying to light them up somehow 
4 Likes
I have the same problem: I tried an anti-aircraft searchlight on my gentlemanās machinery, andā¦ same problem. Canāt see nothing. Too bigā¦
3 Likes
Damnā¦ feel sorry for you! 
Appendix? Tonsils? 1 kidney? etcā¦
I think I know your answer, but will offer anyway.
What if I DM you the questions and answer on your behalf.
For example this is the first question.
If someone approaches a person wearing glasses, carefully removes them from the face of the person wearing them, and then throws them to the ground, cracking both lenses, is that assault or property damage? Why? *
If you still donāt want to engage I can still DM you the questions for interest sake !?
Made me sick, taken out.
We can go this route. Sure. Tonsils and appendix being removed, you can live a long healthy life. You can live long and healthy with one kidney. Shoot. You can technically live without a kidney, lungs, or a heart. You just need to hope power stays on.
I can live a long healthy life with my chips removed.
To be honest, I might be better off taking my xLED out as it causes me mental discomfort. When I said permanent, I was referring to things that allow me to continue to have my quality of life.
I consider my leg permanent. If that helps.
Yes in/on with earrings is perfectly acceptable, but you would not say āshe is wearing earrings ināā¦ but ear plugsā¦ like the kind you wear for hearing protection, you would not use the word āonā only āinā as āshe has ear plugs ināā¦ the on/in for both cases though still means external to the body and easily removableā¦ but yes the idea is that they are synonymous, which also means āshe is wearing chip implantsā does not fit because you would never say that. One might say āshe has breast implants inā thoughā¦ but it would be extremely uncommonā¦ at least in the USā¦ British love to end sentences with āinā hahaā¦ but in the US it would be more like āshe had breast implants put inā, past tenseā¦ but still, never āwearingā or āonā for anything implantedā¦ āhe is wearing a titanium hip replacementāā¦ nope.
Part of the reason I sectioned the questions on the questionnaire was to separate them each so a person could not read aheadā¦ it lets each answer stand on its own as the questionnaire builds on each previous question. If you wanted to DM them, do them one at a time and get answers before sending the next 
2 Likes
That is an interesting perspective. When I had my original m31 magnet, by the time I took it out a year later, it felt like real loss. While not necessary to live, it did afford me an enhanced way to experience and interact with the world around me. Losing that was significant enough to notice a āloss of resolutionā, if that makes sense. Losing my chip implants all together would also feel this way.
I understand that. I have no implants I can relate to like that. If we are talking senses, I canāt miss something I never had. My chips hardly get used, as I realize they are out of my league.
I would be devastated if I lost one of my senses.
1 Like
Thatās basically what I put. Iād consider loss of function assault. Everyone has a different baseline of functionality and due to disability and/or augmentations it may be higher or lower than average. If you remove functionality, even from someone who is considered above average, itās in the same category of removing functionality from someone average. Although frying a chip is less obviously detrimental than kneecapping someone, it still harms the person.
Along this train of thought, Iāve been wanting to put together a group of people that can help create legislation that works for everyone rather than have it be written for us. I donāt think we have the luxury to not be proactive. Iām a little hesitant because thereās so many other pressing political issues right now, but with the recent neuralink announcement, I think it needs to happen sooner rather than later.
4 Likes
I only agree if the thing that loses function, was being worn or was installed. If I disable your arm from afar, as you are wearing it, or actively using it i.e. took it off to adjust your arm sock with the intentionto put it back on. That to me is assault.
If it was off and not being used, that to me is property damage. They still have a loss of function, but to be assault, I feel there has to be person to person interaction.
I would agree. This is the MAIN reason I want the Apex line to be released. I really want it for the password manager part.
I am not shy to admit I am not nearly technically savvy like almost all of you appear to be. I am way more interested in the medical side of this all. In hind sight, I likely would have only implanted the xSIID and Vivokey. I donāt even think I would have ordered the OG one that I bought after the 2nd edition came out. I just really feel like I thought I would enjoy using them, but I lack things to use them on. I plan to leave them all in as there is currently 0 chance of infection with them, and when we get into a new home, I would like to try door locks.
I may be interested. Once my family settles, I would like to start getting involved, and potentially running for a local office. This has been something on my mind for a few years now. As a veteran, I feel like I have full right to shut down people shit. Regardless of how you feel about kneeling during the national anthem, it your right to free speech. I could care less if you wipe your ass with the flag, and set it on fire, singing about anarchy in the USA 
. That is your right.
2 Likes
This is just incredibly great to read in a time when the president says that protests are āanti-americanā. Theyāre āanti-trumpā, definitely, even āanti-policeā in several cases, but seen from the outside in a way, Iād say they are absolutely āpro-americanā, there seem to be a lot of protesters who deeply care about their country and try to save it from whatās going on.
4 Likes
Iād say this counts as derailment and figured I might get a faster answer here than through support. @amal Is there any chance on my order I could get a box without the DT name on it. My Uni seems to open packages to check for content and Iād like to avoid answering those questions 
1 Like
Whaaa? How is that legal?
1 Like
I donāt think it is. But I had a mate with his package shipped here and the tamper tape was cut. I honestly couldnāt care less if they want to know whatās in the package as long as everything is untouched.
@Rosco
Still, that sounds like something prisons do to packages sent to inmates, not universities. Unless the package is not adressed to a specific person.
If I were you, Iād get a PO box.
1 Like
After some research it is illegal but if they have suspicion theyāre allowed to get police involved with a warrant. However we suspect that the RA opened it when it was supposed to be put away until he came to pick it up. If it is opened and their is an issue I can file charges. But as this will be the only thing I have shipped here for the entire semester I donāt believe it warrants a PO box. I do appreciate your suggestion though.
1 Like
Scratch that @amal I wanna see how it pans out if it is opened.
3 Likes
Are you in america?
Yes I am
1 Like