The anti🚫-derailment🚃 & thread🧵 hijackingšŸ”« thread🧵 ⁉

4 Likes

17290990790757074947921212552827

4 Likes

It’s almost midnight on my end and I don’t know where to get pizza at this hour. What have you done!?

:yum:

4 Likes

Fuck you are a cool dude.

Of no real benefit to you, and you put time money and effort into this for others

#HammyIsAGoodCunt

Also, I bought a thing the otherday.
It is LF (Junky draw lock)
I am going to write up a review, but I need to disassemble it to see if I can Move or extend the antenna.

These LF repeaters, Might just be the solution for things like this…
ohhhh, and I just thought of another one.

Man this repeater is going to get a workout…

Oh and another…

I think i just got aroused…

I now have conflicted feelings about you Hammy
:rofl:

7 Likes

(although the video looks ok, in practice and position they aren’t great)
from here

And I just happen to have a spare Easy Guard to test on a bench…

3 Likes

Thanks dude.

Zero benefit to me. I litterally own nothing LF except the LF side of my Xmagic. Which is why this project has kind of been a backburner project, adding to it here and there as i had disposable funds and time. after redesigning the antenna 2-3 times and trying to find why i suck at pcb design. Then fiddling with the LiteVNA to see how i can even see the field for these things… Finally got everything tuned and believe my amazement when i saw this thing working.

3 Likes

I like LF, and is great for simple cheap projects. obviously low security, but for what i use it for, it is fine.

There is plenty of LF stuff ā€œout thereā€
I think the difference lays with the fact that for implants, The FlexEM is the best option to work with LF ā€œthingsā€ but as far as implants go, the FlexEM can be quite daunting.

But your LF repeaters, if they work even half as well as your HF repeaters, it will open up LF projects to all the xEM’s, xMagics, NExTs

it’ll take time, but it should happen.

3 Likes

The downside is that ill never be able to make a Flex style repeater for these. 6 layers is a lot and these are thiiccc bois.

If it helps ill be happy. with the limited testing ive done with just my VNA they look very viable.

5 Likes

Im definitely interested in getting a few from you, i made a lot of LF around :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

Are you able to say how thick in mm? (And fractions of football fields for our imperial friends).

I am very interested in buying some of these if they can fit between the cover panel and the actual reader on some locks I have at work.

Thanks for all your great work on this.

5 Likes

I don’t usually design thin boards but the thinnest 6 layer one that you can get from JLC PCB is 0.8mm thick. And it might be thicker than that.

I’m pretty sure that designing those took some effort. And I kinda want to order some.

:heart_eyes:

3 Likes

That’s pretty bloody thin!!

Here’s hoping!

In imperial it about the foreskin of three moths.

I have no doubt it took a lot of effort … and serious skill.

3 Likes

Well, I’m stopping for ice-cream right now.

:ice_cream:

6 Likes

I’m strangely proud of that.

5 Likes

Now I want ice cream…
Although in fairness, I always want Ice Cream.
:ice_cream:

5 Likes

Do you miss it from your time as a human?

:ice_cream:

5 Likes

Anyone able to write a Magic Gen4 with MCT?
I have the card set to the proper Magic1K7byteUID and no matter what I set from the proxmark I get errors in MCT and can get the card to open the lock … :unamused:
Am I missing something or did I got a dud card?
(Ultimate magic card not bought through DT)

PS: the original card read immediately from MCT with all default keys. It copy to Gen2 without error but it’s hit and miss wether the clones card actually open the lock

1 Like

I don’t think it can handle 7 bytes UID Mifare only 4 bytes classic Mifare?

1 Like

Dam, I think this is 4 bytes
Now I need to check what I have the magic card set to …

Original card:

1 Like

In MCT, do a ā€œDiff Toolā€ (Compare dumps)

2 Likes