I know that this is a pointless meme video, but it still managed to hit close to home⦠The last 5 years have been absolutely crazy.
Regarding the [previous] vid and the use of the word āpseudo-science,ā
[Edit: added the word āpreviousā because you posted another vid while I was typing.]
I find it weird all the recent hate on Meyers-Briggs typologies as āpseudo-scientific.ā What, you mean that fun self-reflection questionnaire we take from websites that have tests like āWhat movie are you,ā āWhich superhero are you,ā and other amusing personality tests shouldnāt be taken as a rigorously scientific medical diagnosis? Gee. How shocking.
Itās weird calling these things āpseudo-science.ā Jung, who promoted the test, explained that while the main body of his work was scientific, he saw no reason that he couldnāt also be curious about non-scientific things. Just donāt take a non-scientific speculation as though it carried scientific weight.
Itās strange to call things āpseudo-scienceā that were never understood as science to begin with. How much more so with business self help books. Itās like calling tabloid magazines gossip about celebrities āpseudo-science.ā Itās not pseudo-scientific, itās simply not scientific, period.
- When it changed.
Or maybe it was in the summer of '47, and itās just taken time for anybody but the cyberspace cowboys to notice.
There was a⦠Time(er)⦠when I would make a 555 joke here, but I wont.
Holy fuck, I love how productive you are and all of your awesome projects, they just keep coming.
Thanks for reminding me how useless I actually am ![]()
I hate to admit it, but I have no idea of how to use the three sea shellsā¦
Just upload me already so that I wonāt ever have to learn⦠Being carbon based has some literally shitty downsidesā¦
I should consider making my references such that anyone has any hope of catching them or realising theyāre references.
i think reference was the wrong word to use, its not referencing anything other than the existence of blue lobers, so its an analogy haha
Can you confirm your Apex is in P0?
Not P1?
P0 is not a usual/ common location for a Flex?
Could you share a photo?
Thereās a pretty harmonious reason why itās called a multivibratorā¦
:robot_gundam:
Totally get that.
P1 Pretty good spot for that too.
Itās an unorthodox location for a Flex, but if it works for you, thatās awesome.
My concern is the stresses it will be under whilst in that location, the term Flex is a misnomer, as it refers to the material used not the Final form of the implant.
Anyway, upto you, I guess this is just to warn you of the possibility of a failure sometime in the future.
I hope Im wrong and it could outlast you
I would suggest though, if you have some important info on it, maybe make a backup.
Its not a bad idea anyway, I have a backup for mine
Thanks for sharing the pictures.
One more question
Are you currently using it on a door? The reason I ask is, in my experience, i havenāt found the ApexFlex to play as nicely with as many RFID locks as other implants with the exception of Tesla.
So if you have found a new lock, i would like to add it to the compatibility matrix.
thanks for sharing
Iām in IT and the most hand stress I get is the occasional trip to the range, although I appreciate the concern. I have a backup card and an Apex Ring conversion at L1 on my right hand.
The doors work with NFC passkeys via domain connector.
NGL, Iāve always loved the Atmel box art. And their adds were great as well, I wish that my electronics magazine collection wasnāt at my parentās houseā¦
I hope that Microchip didnāt fire the artists and that that weāll get more cool boxes in the future, But they moved a significant part of their engineering department to India and this makes me think that the management at team red doesnāt like paying salaries. Anyways, a cyborg can dreamā¦
Termites making alien noisesā¦







