Personalities are like assholes: everybody has one, and it’s ill-advised to impose it on everybody else.
and as it seems it’s going to be less necessary to tolerate others.
Especially if working-from-home jobs proliferate.
I have a great recipe to tolerate everybody: I ignore them 
My only rule is, leave me be and I’ll leave you be. Beyond that, you may be, do or say what you want: if I like it that’s great. If I don’t, you simply drop off my radar and I move on. It makes life so simple and peaceful.
Now that makes me intensely curious.
YUP!
Being part of a larger group decreases the vulnerability of an individual against predators. However, other threats like pests or illnesses can be more likely to occur.
Peronospore on Basil … Panama Disease … Plague Mask
Interestingly fighting against physical force needs mostly more power or strength in response. Either to fight back or to escape, or if escaping is not possible then cause damage or withstand the attack.
The larger a group gets the bigger the chance is of the formation of clusters within the structure of hierarchy. Individuals specialise to complete certain tasks.
The structure remains coherent until the common goal of the group and the availability of resources are unchanged.
The gap in a broken continuity is called schism.
External threat not only can generate but also hold structures together.
I would argue that the ubiquity of good leads to dilapidation.
No blurrrrr!! Not at all!
1 Like
