Yes and No,
I personally think the xAC is a great product, great price and the antenna is excellent for xSeries implants.
The Mod That @Devilclarke is working on ( Toggleator ) is a very elegant and simple add on solution.
Also I believe his longer term plan? is to possibly / maybe come up with an all encompassing design in conjunction with DT and I assume @TomHarkness for antenna design?
2 Likes
Lol no I know the requirements for class 1 i.e. most consumer electronics and you are absolutely right if you take a look at those boards they are crazy.
2 Likes
HAHA i did, anyway that would be what i would like to do yes.
looking at the FCC info this was filed in 1996, its a good chance that the “off the shelf” device (prior to conversion to xAC) is a new old stock potentially obsolete but 1000’s still exist in a warehouse.
EDIT: HRH Vertriebs GmbH the company that makes them no longer appears to exits (no longer registered as a company in Germany)
EDIT 2: company address is now owned by DRUCKEREI ZEIDLER GMBH & CO. KG a printers so even more cause to say the devices are New old stock
2 Likes
Ya I noticed that after I posted and still had no idea what you were taking about. Had to do some searching and figured it out. Lol thanks.
2 Likes
Maybe they are all in the Dangerous Things Warehouse…
So here is the plan, Let’s buy all the xACs so that you can make us the xAC V2… I would make a great businessman, that plan is flawless
2 Likes
hehe, no problems there
P.S. ive ordered some Rev 2 Toggleator’s
1 Like
No you are right after I thought about it. A custom made product would cost more, why pay the extra price when we have something that already works.
2 Likes
Actually, as you are a fine english gentleman,
THIS is more apt
3 Likes
Thats the point, it “works” hence the mods and using what we have. There are 2 issues though;
- The stock will eventually run out.
- Only works with EM41 & 42 ID’S
To elaborate on point 2, the xEM is a T5557 chip that can replicate many different ID standards. The problem is if I have my xEM setup to unlock a door at work (HID) then I can’t use it for the xAC.
The ultimate goal is to have a universal LF rfid access controller that is tuned to work with implants.
Love it!!
2 Likes
I think you mean “unobtainable” not “ultimate”
Why would it be unobtainable? I see no reason if we design it.
125kHz modulated carrier should be easy to decode?
1 Like
Well you did not state LF RFID not even the PM3 is a universal RFID reader.
It might be possible to make a reader that works with at least most of the things a t5577 can emulate.
Personally I would prefer a HF and LF reader that works with the more common standards.
2 Likes
My apologies i did not (fixed now).
what i am envisioning is essentially a cut down proxmark3 v2 no emulation or anything the whole analog front end design is basically there so should’t be massively hard.
always use a qualifier hence the massively
1 Like
Fair
But
since I already grabbed the gif
1 Like
I think the various modulation encodings and formats would still be an issue. The PM3 you issue a command telling it what you want to do.
I am not an expert in the electronics under the hood but only way I can naively see it working is if you basically run lf search
repeatedly which would make it less responsive.
I am yet to see something like a lf hid watch
that is ‘universal’
Unless it is universally configurable… that might work. So it wont work with any LF tag all the time but could be configured with a dip switch array or something in very vaigly same way the t5577 can emulate many cards but not at once…
1 Like
I used to work for a large military supplier as a QA engineer. One of our products was an intervalometer for aircraft-borne rocket launchers.
The PCB for that thing was chock-full of shorts, connection bridges, extra resistors and caps tacked on as if they were aftertoughts - and the whole affair was then potted to avoid failure due to vibrations.
When I enquired about that sorry mess, and asked why we didn’t redesign the board entirely (which was my job after all), the reply was: as long as we modify the original board from the 60s, it’s a modification. If we redesign the board, it’s a new product and it’ll have to be certified by the FAA and the EASA as such - by modern certification standards. The 1960s board was never certified because it was a military product, and it was exempt back then, so we could do anything we wanted.
Yikes… The damn thing was more tacked-on modifications than original product. And I know for a fact that it’s still flying…
2 Likes
I saw some boards like that at my last job. I know they went into the rockets though not into the launchers. Anyway we had a specific path that a bunch of jumper wires had to follow and extra caps on the board then we had to tack down all the stuff so it didn’t move lol.
2 Likes