The antišŸš«-derailmentšŸšƒ & threadšŸ§µ hijackingšŸ”« threadšŸ§µ ā‰

not knowing what a Sam or Nard isā€¦ This sentence really makes me giggle

3 Likes

Me either, but I got curious


How the Seader App Works With HID SAMs and Flipper Zero

MK

Mert Karakaya

ā€¢Published Dec 01, 2023 03:52 AM

While Flipper Zero (see test) has become a viral sensation, it does not work out of the box with HIDā€™s widely used SE / Seos ā€œhighly secureā€ credentials. However, a new app, Seader, enables working with and even exploiting those credentials on HID ā€œstandard profileā€ readers.

IPVM Image

In this test, we explain how the Seader app works and leverages HIDā€™s product to decipher iClass SE and Seos credentials.

LINK

3 Likes

Iā€™ll have some sam for my nard and a cup of coffee for me please :point_up:

3 Likes

I made a ā€œsuper Xemā€ :sweat_smile:
I installed an Xem about 1/4" away from my NExT (the next is gonna come off soonā„¢ ā€¦ ) and I get super read out of the 2 t5577 in parallel :rofl:
(Both have the same data)

4 Likes

new-flex-416x416

When you get a Flex implant installed, is it put in chip-side facing up at the skin, or down towards the rest of the fleshy-bits?

Does it matter?

OHHHHHHHH
Shiny

:star_struck:

I donā€™t believe it does.
The encapsulation smoothes it out so it may have a flat bottom and hump on top,
Depending on where you put it, It might fit one way better than the other.

My rationale was to minimise the potential of bending therefore separating the chip from the board.

I have flexes in my forearms and P1ā€™s , and P4

Pretty excited for you

1 Like

DT takes some darn good photos: FlexDF :classic_tongue:

This was my main concern as well, though I do also wonder if the chip being on one side or the other would have any meaningful impact on read-range

Iā€™m thinking L3 at the moment

Thanks! Me too :classic_grin:

My installer, I believe, said chip up to give a better read. That was based off of a one time incident where his previous client couldnā€™t get a read until he filpped the implant. Take this will a grain of salt though, as Iā€™m fuzy on the details.

1 Like

@DBP
Can you weigh in on the orientation question?

1 Like

My favorite comment on the matter:

5 Likes

I did tests before I installed my Apex Flex for the same reason, I didnā€™t bother with my older copper style antenna as it didnā€™t matter.

This was done via eye-ometer, I was happy enough with the results to say there was no noticeable difference.

I have designed a test rig in my head. ( One that anyone can make with a few cheap and basic parts )
It will be accurate and should be a simple and quick build, I just havenā€™t really made it a priority.

However
@Aoxhwjfoavdlhsvfpzha
"Your request is important to us, please hold the line, we will be with you shortly

You are number 1 in the queue"

i.e. I will get it done tomorrow with some definitive answers

3 Likes

Iā€™ve learned from trial and error

Chip side up :rofl:

1 Like

@Aoxhwjfoavdlhsvfpzha
I built the test rig and conducted the testing and I have the results for you.

The difference between Chip up and Chip down was

image

Iā€™ll do a project write up later for anybody who may want to make themselves a cheap, quick and easy range tester

Hereā€™s a teaser of V1.0

4 Likes

Thanks @Pilgrimsmaster!

2 Likes

Iā€™d rather use an implant, doesnā€™t take up space or get lost.

4 Likes

My quick opinion:
I feel like asking before using content is a more respectful way than doing it and having the person find out afterwards. Terms of service are one thing and make sense the way they are, but IRL people are mostly unaware of them and would be negatively surprised to see their content ā€œcommerciallyā€ used without a courtesy notification.
While things like reposting or tagging on social media are widely accepted, taking photos from a forum to put on a product page is arguably less conventional and deserves a bit more finesse.
I personally donā€™t care, if I post it online itā€™s public end of the story but thatā€™s not everyoneā€™s opinion especially when business is involved.

3 Likes

Yeah itā€™s like of those things like; we will behave in a way thatā€™s more socially acceptable and respectful, but the policy will be written in such a way as to protect us in the most broad terms possible - i.e. weā€™ll ask even though we donā€™t have to (according to the policy). That way if someone comes later and says ā€œI never gave permissionā€, the policy is written in such a way as to not require it in the first place.

I wish everyone played nice all the time forever, but thatā€™s not reality unfortunately.

6 Likes

Not that I would ever assume the contrary, but would you consider adding a warrant canary to the tos?

1 Like

Dumb question, does that also applies to ā€œprivateā€ messages or publicly posted content only?

I probably wont mind image being posted, but i dont want personal info posted ā€¦ This is as close as a social network i engage in :sweat_smile:

1 Like

Updated

3 Likes