not knowing what a Sam or Nard isā¦ This sentence really makes me giggle
Me either, but I got curious
How the Seader App Works With HID SAMs and Flipper Zero
MK
ā¢Published Dec 01, 2023 03:52 AM
While Flipper Zero (see test) has become a viral sensation, it does not work out of the box with HIDās widely used SE / Seos āhighly secureā credentials. However, a new app, Seader, enables working with and even exploiting those credentials on HID āstandard profileā readers.
In this test, we explain how the Seader app works and leverages HIDās product to decipher iClass SE and Seos credentials.
Iāll have some sam for my nard and a cup of coffee for me please
I made a āsuper Xemā
I installed an Xem about 1/4" away from my NExT (the next is gonna come off soonā¢ ā¦ ) and I get super read out of the 2 t5577 in parallel
(Both have the same data)
When you get a Flex implant installed, is it put in chip-side facing up at the skin, or down towards the rest of the fleshy-bits?
Does it matter?
OHHHHHHHH
Shiny
I donāt believe it does.
The encapsulation smoothes it out so it may have a flat bottom and hump on top,
Depending on where you put it, It might fit one way better than the other.
My rationale was to minimise the potential of bending therefore separating the chip from the board.
I have flexes in my forearms and P1ās , and P4
Pretty excited for you
DT takes some darn good photos: FlexDF
This was my main concern as well, though I do also wonder if the chip being on one side or the other would have any meaningful impact on read-range
Iām thinking L3 at the moment
Thanks! Me too
My installer, I believe, said chip up to give a better read. That was based off of a one time incident where his previous client couldnāt get a read until he filpped the implant. Take this will a grain of salt though, as Iām fuzy on the details.
My favorite comment on the matter:
I did tests before I installed my Apex Flex for the same reason, I didnāt bother with my older copper style antenna as it didnāt matter.
This was done via eye-ometer, I was happy enough with the results to say there was no noticeable difference.
I have designed a test rig in my head. ( One that anyone can make with a few cheap and basic parts )
It will be accurate and should be a simple and quick build, I just havenāt really made it a priority.
However
@Aoxhwjfoavdlhsvfpzha
"Your request is important to us, please hold the line, we will be with you shortly
You are number 1 in the queue"
i.e. I will get it done tomorrow with some definitive answers
Iāve learned from trial and error
Chip side up
@Aoxhwjfoavdlhsvfpzha
I built the test rig and conducted the testing and I have the results for you.
The difference between Chip up and Chip down was
Iāll do a project write up later for anybody who may want to make themselves a cheap, quick and easy range tester
Hereās a teaser of V1.0
My quick opinion:
I feel like asking before using content is a more respectful way than doing it and having the person find out afterwards. Terms of service are one thing and make sense the way they are, but IRL people are mostly unaware of them and would be negatively surprised to see their content ācommerciallyā used without a courtesy notification.
While things like reposting or tagging on social media are widely accepted, taking photos from a forum to put on a product page is arguably less conventional and deserves a bit more finesse.
I personally donāt care, if I post it online itās public end of the story but thatās not everyoneās opinion especially when business is involved.
Yeah itās like of those things like; we will behave in a way thatās more socially acceptable and respectful, but the policy will be written in such a way as to protect us in the most broad terms possible - i.e. weāll ask even though we donāt have to (according to the policy). That way if someone comes later and says āI never gave permissionā, the policy is written in such a way as to not require it in the first place.
I wish everyone played nice all the time forever, but thatās not reality unfortunately.
Not that I would ever assume the contrary, but would you consider adding a warrant canary to the tos?
Dumb question, does that also applies to āprivateā messages or publicly posted content only?
I probably wont mind image being posted, but i dont want personal info posted ā¦ This is as close as a social network i engage in
Updated