My favorite comments so far (oh god the predictable comments) are;


pfff HAHA!
Think what you want about Bezos… for a single moment in history, he had a point of view I agreed with;
The interviewer just classically does not get it… they’re the type of person who will miss out on opportunity after opportunity because they just don’t get the most simple truths, even when they are plainly laid out in front of them. They are too busy arguing their own point of view, simply dismissing everything else instead of listening, thinking, and either adjusting their point of view or coming up with a valid argument.
Too bad that view didn’t remain (if he was honest to begin with). Post-purchase Kindle updates to force ads when off and forbid access to files except through their store. Make exclusive anticompetitive deals to force buyers and sellers to go through them. Undercut competitors at a loss until they go out of business to secure a monopoly with increased prices. Anti-competition, anti-competition, anti-competition until the customer experience is irrelevant because the customer has no other options.
that’s “enshittification” 100%
Yup. I don’t believe that capitalism inevitably deteriorates into late stage capitalism, but laissez faire capitalism does. Need anti-trust laws to preserve free markets.
Fortunately, even while the mega-corporations become corrupt, there remain good companies, like yours. I really respect the way you share your knowledge and research, fostering a healthy competitive spirit where success isn’t about how much of the pie can be monopolised, but about everyone striving to add their best offerings to the table. That’s how we keep getting more and better treats, and that’s a good customer experience.
The thing about capitalism is that it is only half of the “great economic system” proponents always tout that it is. Traditional capitalism vs the post-1976 “shareholder value” capitalism we have today necessitates heavy government regulation.
Old definition of capitalism
Maximizing shareholder value
If the new “shareholder” based version of capitalism sounds a bit like the paperclip apocalypse, that’s because it kind of is… reducing the operating principle of any corporation to a singular goal, even if it means eating its own customers in the process.
The version of capitalism we have now is like fire… well controlled, it can be extremely useful, allowing comfortable living with minimal risk… the goal of well reasoned government regulation is to stop out of control “shareholder value” capitalism from burning everything to the ground.
I take more of the stakeholder theory approach, because in the end, it’s how we all benefit while keeping some small chunk of our souls intact.
Whoever made this is diabolical…
Honestly… where the hell is Atari? Pong? Yes, my father bought a pong game and I remember playing it as a very wee lad.
Also missing the TurboGrafx 16… came out same time as the SNES. Otherwise, I had all of those, plus the Atari 2600
No og Gameboy brick
Nice try… aint clicking on that…
I already got you to fall for it once. Best $10 I ever spent.
Unless its a sub bullet point.
For hierarchical context
I think its also called a nestled point
I’ve never wanted to punch someone through USPS more. Like a express insured slap.
I got that notification and I was like oh cool. Then rickroll
Ahh, true, good point (
)
Will you take this video of my sister’s cat as an apology? ![]()
I’m not clicking on that!!
Not even for me ![]()