UV tattoos and borging up

Amazon sells it.

Can i derail this topic for a sec? no? okay.

I have done some test spot tattoos ive done with strontium alluminate.

I disinfected and washed the particles and then mixed them with invisible UV tattoo ink.



@Spyfoxls has some way more impressive ones.

6 Likes

:heart_eyes:
This is pretty much what Iā€™m thinking about - afaik, SuperLuminova is based on strontium aluminate.
Looks pretty shiny under your skin, this is just great! Did you charge it with an UV flashlight before taking the picture, or is it actually that strong?

Aaaaand, since youā€™re already playing the guinea pig (thanks for that :smile:) - how long have you got it, and did you have any problems? Like, inflammation, unusual itching, anything that immediately indicates that this stuff shouldnā€™t be in your body?

1 Like

Heya,

i charged it with my phone flashlight. the image was done just a few days after i poked it.

I poked them on first of november i think.

and yes, my body did not like it alot ^^ but im also really bad at tattooing. poked so hard that the individual needles bent.


it itched a bit and was kinda swollen

i need to shoot a image how it looks today.

3 Likes

Haha, so okaaaay, poking needles through skin like that might be irritating :smile:
But if thatā€™s just some kind of first reaction and not like hellish inflammation, festering and your body actively trying to remove the pigments again, I might risk it :wink:

So theyā€™re about 1.5 months old nowā€¦ any decrease in intensity by now? From what I read, at least some strontium aluminate based pigments might lose a bit of their glow when in touch with water, thatā€™s why I was thinking about mixing them with something like shellac first before dispersing them with water or inkā€¦

1 Like


This image is from today.
yeah it fades alot in the first week but then stopped an d stayd the same brightness.

also i did not treat the particles at all. was reading that they behave like ceramic particles and dont really react with water. at some point someone sent me an article that told the opposite and that it decomposes in water.



here are the scars.

oh and @Pilgrimsmaster

i think the time has come to move our conversation to another place :sweat_smile:

4 Likes

True - we used our special cyborg skill again :wink:

Thanks a lot! It still looks really good, and the scars are not that bad (compared to first day, especially).
Iā€™m really curious if I can avoid the initial fading somehowā€¦ I know someone who has close contact to one of those insanely expensive swiss watchmakers who actually work with those pigments, so I hope I can gather some more information about it (and maybe even get the pigments that way).
But seeing your results, Iā€™m pretty optimistic and totally willing to try it out - by being a tiny bit more reckless than me, you really helped me a lot :slight_smile:
Thank you :slight_smile:
:unicorn_love:

3 Likes

Depends on which watch obviously, but I was under the impression the really nice and expensive one weā€™re using Tritium

1 Like

Haha, yeah, I didnā€™t even think about the relpy side of that threadā€¦

Done, and @LordSethos2000 I hope you dont mind this here in your thread, let me know if you want me to relocate it

It just simply what we do, implants and derail threads.

In thought the same, BUT havenā€™t done any research, so :man_shrugging:

2 Likes

Iā€™ve seen some rolex submariner 1680 original spare parts on eBay, both the hands and the watch face had the tritium inserts

1 Like

The more traditional (aka boring :stuck_out_tongue: ) ones might still do :woman_shrugging:
The ones I was talking about are https://www.urwerk.com/ and I think they use SuperLuminova - not totally sure, but I know a lot of those high-price swiss watchmakers use it.

Yeaaahā€¦ thanks for giving us a new home here in this thread :wink:

3 Likes

A few watches have small tritium filled glass vials on the hands and dial but most high end ones use Superluminova.

IIRC, the tritium stuff was mostly used for military watches. But from what Iā€™ve heard, G Shocks are the most common in that particular field nowadays.

Maybe I should get myself both a tritium watch and a G Shock, however I donā€™t have any desire to enlistā€¦

And Iā€™m now contemplating the idea of Superluminova tattoos. Although Iā€™d rather convince Amal to upload me to a Boston Dynamics Atlas. Shouldnā€™t be too different from what he did for @Pilgrimsmasterā€¦

4 Likes

I think the initial loss in brightness might be due to the particles that didnā€™t get into the right depth and got shedded with skin again.

Also not sure if i mentioned yet but it also seems to work to rub the sterilised pigment into a fresh scarification. And leave the scab until healed. This uses quite alot of pigment though and quite a bit is shedded with the scab. Just thought of this since those were actually my very first tries. Depending of the depth and width there might be inconcistencies in glow power afterwards though depending on how it healed.

2 Likes

I thought about this as well, especially since I have a good (and adventurous) scarification artist who might be more willing to try that out than my tattoo artist (and my tattooing friend is actually a bit too lazy and not really willing to cover my whole body :smile: )ā€¦ but when I think about my first two scarifications, they bled quite a bit and were quite ā€œwetā€ for the first days, so I would be afraid that lots of pigments would be washed outā€¦
How did you treat your scars afterwards? Did you cover them? And if you say those were your first tries, how do they look now (like, do they still glow nicely, did you tolerate the pigments well enough, did it cause any problems)?

Might very well be that wayā€¦ I didnā€™t think of that, but yeah, ā€œnormalā€ tattoos lose quite a bit of pigments as well during the first few days.

1 Like

Little update on this one - my artist is not really recommending trying this out :smile:
In Germany, Tattoo artists currently face a lot of trouble because of inks that are suddenly deemed ā€œunsafeā€ by the authorities, so there is little chance that anyone would use some sort of ā€œselfmadeā€ ink. So, it would definitely come down to self-poking or motivating my slightly lazy friend :wink:
Plus, it is not really sure how safe this stuff is in the long run. And the manufacturers of the pigments wonā€™t tell you itā€™s safe to get them under your skin, because they can get into serious trouble when doing so.

Buuuutā€¦ I found a shop that sells lots of glowy stuff, including pigments (and they are even waterproof!), and I sent them a mail where I said Iā€™d like to use their pigments for bodypainting, and if it would be dangerous if I had some little sore spots or tiny wounds or anything like thatā€¦ Letā€™s see what theyā€™ll answer :wink:

7 Likes

image

I love how that gif was literally what popped into my head Lol

Just had this video pop up on Facebook!

Some comments are interesting, most are crap :unamused:

Stand alone like that noā€¦ Iā€™m all for UV to enhance ink. But as someone whoā€™s heavily tattedā€¦ i dont see the point of invisible tattoos. :confused:

I like the idea of having some tattoos only show under specific circumstances (being UV lighting in this case). But I also prefer always visible tattoos of course (D-10 for my 4th one :star_struck:).

1 Like