Nice.. diskodex.. roladisk.. something cool
3 Likes
Sup dude, that’s my mal. It was made as a PoC. Ideally if used in the wild it would be compiled into a binary payload, delivered either SE or supply chain.
Bambu paid a bounty out for it and patched. Your shit is more secure now, you’re welcome.
Was happy to see their printers aren’t a rolling IoT dumpster fire like everything else, high five.
2 Likes
Don’t worry, they’re just overpriced rolling IoT dumpster fire contrary to the rest of the regular priced rolling IoT dumpster fire …
2 Likes
Nice! Thanks for making the world slightly less insecure. I can’t believe that they actually patched it! pop pop ret!
Now if anyone knows how I can get my brain to do anything besides xchg eax, eax after all the holiday frustrations, social pressure, and constant interruptions… Fuck collectivist cultures! But I’m derailing here…
2 Likes
They’re surprisingly decently secure.
All LAN traffic is ssl/tls encrypted, NIC supports WPA3, user access codes are long enough to where brute forcing wouldn’t be feasible, etc, etc.
1 Like
So secure you can’t use them with third party software and they can push updates to lock you out of more of your equipment without asking you …
I think they had a few good ideas early on, but their practices are, at best, shady …
2 Likes
Yeah, I definitely prefer a less “secure” printer that just…doesn’t demand I connect it to the internet at all.
3 Likes
This section does not apply to three-dimensional printers manufactured for, and exclusively sold to, buyers with a valid federal firearms manufacturing license issued under U.S.C. Sec. 923
“Three-dimensional printer” means (a) any machine capable of rendering a three-dimensional object from a digital design file using additive manufacturing or (b) any machine capable of making three dimensional modifications to an object from a digital design file using subtractive manufacturing.
Looks looks like we will need to give feds access and approval to all printer and CNC machines if we want to stay compliant …
2321.pdf (79.9 KB)
2 Likes
Glad I’m not in the US… But if I was, I’d STFU about my love for open source printers, and I’d also consider moving elsewhere…
“Someone could make guns, so we need to regulate making.”
That’s ridiculously dumb and it will give an artificial advantage to 3D printer manufacturers that bend over. Now it could go even further, with only American 3D printer manufacturers being allowed to bend over… What next? A government official being required on the board of 3D printer and CNC machine manufacturers?
I know that bigger and more accurate CNC machines are already regulated by the US and manufacturers have to add an accelerometer so that the machine has to be relicensed if it’s ever moved.
If I ever get a printer with that government garage, I’ll jailbreak it. Even if I have to replace the electronics. But I’m bound to build more open source machines anyways…
Land if the free highly regulated, I guess…
2 Likes
O.K. who’s gonna tell them that all objects are three-dimensional?
5 Likes
Anyone know where I can find a 3D model of the stock Proxmark3 RDV4 shell/case? The shell that comes from the factory (no blue shark or antenna mods). Mine is all scratched up and I can’t find any models online (or places to buy a new shell)
2 Likes
I’m on the same boat, the rubberized coating on mine is starting to fall apart… And the plastic under that coating is not as nice as I’d like.
I’ve been looking into model kit paint, but those often need to be applied with an airbrush. And I’d prefer to avoid buying a tool that I’m rarely going to use.
I might be able to come up with a printable antenna cover. But I’d prefer to buy an injection molded case without the soft touch coating.
1 Like
I modified the cover in this post:
I have yet to print this, so it might not work… Wish me luck printing it on my end.
PM3 RDV4 Stock Cover.zip (60.1 KB)
7 Likes
@enginerd Thank you soooo much! That’s exactly what I needed! I started printing it when I left for work. I’ll let you know how it fits when I get home!
6 Likes
Fits perfectly! I printed it in Carbon Fiber PETG so that it would still have a nice texture to it (though very different to the original texture).
Now I just need to find a model for the top section so they match 
Thanks again!
5 Likes
Ummmm, It looks great, BUT Carbon Fibre is not the best for signal propagation
LF will probably not be too badly affected, but your HF one I would expect to be noticeably degraded.
I stand to be corrected, But I would suggest print in another material to compare.
Regardless, it does actually look great
4 Likes
Turns out it’s fine for magnetic fields (passes just fine).. not so much for electric fields (absorbs). This highlights the difference between magnetically coupled devices like passive RFID / NFC and electric field radio transmissions.
3 Likes
Well, changing magnetic fields are different as those will induce eddy currents in conducive carbon fiber mat. But a fixed magnetic field will not be affected.
However, carbon filled polymers contain short pieces of (often recycled) fiber instead of the long strands that you find in mat. So it should affect things a lot less than a proper carbon fiber composite part. If it even affects things to begin with.
Still, some carbon filaments are slightly conducive and might still decrease the range a little bit.
In any case, now I’m tempted to give fussy skin a go as I’m not a fan of CF filaments because they’re a big hassle and require hardened nozzles that have a lower thermal conductivity.
2 Likes
@caj380 some testing would be awesome if you have the time
2 Likes
Sure! I have a NanoVNA but I might need some guidance as I have no idea how to use it.
1 Like