Eh, I said “style” so you’re exactly in the ball park I meant,
Cool… I can’t remember what currently… but I wanted to use some of those for various projects but was always bad at their poor/useless implant performance
Because we (being a curious group of… us) are who we are, has anybody tried stacking two or more to see the effects? Maybe with 1/4" to 19mm separation?
And am I the only one who imagines someone setting up a line of carefully spaced stickers to see just how far they can go?
Every sticker introduces a signal delay, so eventually the readers either times out waiting for a response or the data becomes desynchronized and invalid
NOT the first thing I tried (With Hammys V2.1) But did try whilst using a VNA.
I got 2 distinct troughs forming a tight “W”
Left trough slightly low, right trough bang on 13.56MHz
So my observation was not that of an increased depth of trough, but rather a slightly wider frequency read range.
None of this was particularly scientific, more slapped on to see what would happen, and that was my result
haha, I love that you used IMPERIAL which is Evil, and what I love even more is the Darth Vader gif, ESPECIALLY since Darth Vader ends up “seeing the light”
So I guess that means youll be joining the 96% of the world with metric…
But my guess is, That’ll happen when Star Wars is good again…
These arrived yesterday. Installed some. They are certainly worth it.
Please excuse my ignorance but I would love to have a RFID extender for the 125s as well. Is this possible? I can see myself installing them under some of the lesser powered readers at work!
The Qi receiver uses a 4 layer rigid PCB and at 25mm diameter I was able to get 20uH. That means I’d need 81nF of capacitance to tune it to 125kHz. That would have a really low Q factor and the performance would be poor I think.
If we switched to flex so the windings are closer and made a 6 layer I might be able to get a couple hundred microhenries, which would be a lot better. That antenna routing would be very…interesting
Unfortunately it would be 4 times the thickness and 7 times the cost per unit, so we’d really have to commit to that, especially with development time and buying multiple tuning revisions.
Yeah I mean I appreciate that, but we’re talking about minimum of $600 for each tuning revision of the minimum order quantity, and $2300 for 1000 units after that is done. That’s not even including labor for engineering. Even if you paid $20 per unit (which I would consider high) and ordered 5, that wouldn’t put even a small dent in the development costs. That’s the big problem we have