Yeah I dig your approach. The problem is, it’s kind of a losing battle in the US: the size and inertia of the tactless authority makes your efforts essentially pointless.
I like Deviant Ollam’s approach: he flies with an AR15 lower or something in his case, so by law he’s required to put a proper lock on his luggage, and the friggin’ security theater detail is required to have him unlock it himself. That secures his case properly and annoys the shit out of the TSA.
There are many examples of TSA locks never actually being utilized… In fact the lock picking lawyer did a whole video about how a gun safe could not actually be opened with the TSA key because of the way the toggle was designed internally… It was simply impossible to open with the TSA key because it was blocked from turning the correct direction. The fact that this gun safe is still actually sold today tells me that the TSA just cares that the TSA lock is there, and they don’t actually use it. Just by its existence they figure whatever is inside is fine.
This talk about physical security got me watching @DeviantOllam videos again and I was a little surprised to see @Eriequiet safe featured in a little talk he did.
Carrying a lower is one option, tossing an athletic starter pistol in is another. Pretty much anything like that is unlikely to actually get you in trouble anywhere but does require you to lock your luggage properly.
Bruce Sterling also makes a point of mocking security theatre. You can only carry tiny bottles of shampoo, but if you wear contact lenses you can carry a full sized bottle of saline. He has been known to carry two bottles marked saline full of liquid. When asked why two he simply said that he had two eyes.
Totally off any subject, but I couldn’t help myself earlier at a Killers concert, when they played their song Human, I was probably the only one singing the lyrics, “Are we human, or are we cyborgs, my sign is vital, my hands are chipped, and…”. My crazy mind just thinks of stuff like that…
If I wasn’t so disgusted by the whole thing, I’d invent a harmless “preventative” in the spirit of Di-Hydrogen Mono-oxide, so the idiots wouldn’t poison themselves.
It’s bad enough they’re willing to hurt themselves, but they always have to try and take everybody else down the same bad path.
I do wonder though, if they could invent a vaccine pill, (and maybe not call it a vaccine publicly), would the antivax folks jump all over it? I really think there’s some psychological angle about needles / shots powering alot of this.