Hey yâall, I remember there being a page on the site with a list of all the chips + their applications next to them. Stuff like ISO numbers, and generic tags like âAccess controlâ. I canât find it on the sitemap anymore, is it still a thing?
Though itâs not a particularly all-encompassing list
@Aoxhwjfoavdlhsvfpzha provided you with what you asked about, heres another spin on it
Its a shame this hasnât been updated for a while, I really like the table despite it being a bit reductionist.
@Pilgrimsmaster Thats a cool sheet I look at too, but its not really beginner friendly, I wouldnât send it to a friend.
Iâm not a fan of spreadsheets either.
You can make it less overwhelming, but looking at an implant and following it through to find something compatiable with it
OR
Find a lock etc. that you have or want to get, and follow that to find a compatible implant
Itâs not pretty, but it does work
Well, I had nothing else to do tonight.
No promises on accuracy, but Iâll proofread it tomorrow (or soonâą)
Bonus points to anyone who finds an error and DMs it to me
THAT is fucken cool.
Iâve only just opened it, and not read through it yet, but it looks really useful
This is awesome
I think this will quickly become a baseline reference for lots of people.
How easy would it be to add the lock compatibility spreadsheet to it?
I donât think I can envision a way of doing that which would be any better than just using the spreadsheet as is
But, if you or anyone else would like to pitch an idea of what that might look like, Iâd certainly be willing to consider it
This is one of the more fundamental issues with this technology⊠the web of knowledge that needs to be communicated⊠itâs difficult.
Hence the tendency to attract nerds with tech backgrounds.
Seriously, show of hands.
Network specialist.
in other words⊠iâm extremely interested in problem solving this particular hurdle⊠how do we set up some sort of practical way to have a relative newb step into the world of RFID and quickly be able to figure out âwhich chip should I getâ ⊠thatâs the crux at the end of the day. Itâs a complex problem.
I see two main âbranchesâ if you will⊠they can be summed up in two words; ânewâ and âexistingâ systems.
New systems can be built to suit so itâs about finding gear compatible with an implant or implants and making the system work. The compatibility spreadsheet is extremely useful in this scenario.
Existing systems face a different challenge that involves figuring out the current system through testing and researching the current technologies in use, then figuring out what your options are between cloning, enrollment, or conversion.
How do we set up a step-by-step for new people entering the game that is intuitive and well, isnât walls and walls of text? Is there a practical way?
Thatâs where I think the NExT and xMagic are awesome, one of them will fit 90% of the application most people will ever encounter.
Add the xSIID for those who want some light âŠ
Making a handout or a page showcasing those 3 implant would be a great manageable bite into the RFID/DT world âŠ
In terms of techy, Iâm more on the hardware side
I could image some sort of quiz/survey that would ask questions about what systems the user uses or wants to use and suggests one or more chips based on responses. Not sure how such a system would be made, but just throwing an idea out there.
That must have taken you a while.
A big thanks on behalf of the community for taking the time to make all our lives just a little more easy.
I liked you decision on the filter
must meet ALL criteria
ie. I selected dual chips temperature
it showed nothing rather than both.
I would hate for this to dissappear into the ether of this thread, so if you want a dedicated thread for this, I can move your post and the replies to it, or if you want to start a new thread, have at it.
Iâll add a Watched word to âChips Stuffâ, for easier lookup ond reference, unless you want a new word/phrase
this was a good first thought. the only thing is that a quiz / questionnaire structure doesnât do much to educate and in fact many of the pathways require them to go do something like test something or research or post photos and ask questions on the forum.
i think ultimately there will be some sort of navigable method to educate while doing some determination as to which chip(s) and products will work best for them⊠what format that takes is still in question
A flow chart would do it, but the interface is the âissueâ
Actually, I hadnât realized how helpful that would be, that was thanks to a DM from @SnarkBe
Iâll leave distributing and searching up to you if you donât mind, however you think might be the most helpful
i think a flow chart is actually a really great visualizer of the problem itself though. i will start on that since weâll have a much better idea of what weâre dealing with⊠then we can start solutioning